Rhetoric and Skepticism in Antitrust Argument
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Law as Rhetoric, Rhetoric as Argument
Many lawyers lack a basic understanding of the structure and process of legal argumentation. Their limited understanding, which often leads to less than effective advocacy, stems from legal education's failure to make the structure and process of legal argument explicit and systematic. One approach to this problem is to explore the intrinsic relationship of law to rhetoric. Because law and rhet...
متن کاملThe regress argument against Cartesian skepticism
Does the external world exist, as it so concretely seems? Perhaps not, says the Cartesian skeptic. After all, if you were dreaming or hallucinating, if an evil demon were bent on deceiving you, or if, god forbid, you were a brain in a vat, things might appear to you in just the same way. Why think, then, that you are experiencing good old reality rather than some dream or other fiction? Absent ...
متن کاملPsychology, epistemology, and skepticism in Hume's argument about induction
Do we yet understand Hume's project in his main argument about induction in Treatise I.iii.6? Is the argument skeptical? Is it even so much as epistemological, skeptical or otherwise? Or is it merely psychological? Although the literature has made much progress on these questions, we have not reached a full understanding of Hume's position. I hope to fill in some missing pieces of the interpret...
متن کاملInvestigating the relationship between temper and professional skepticism in auditors
Background & Aim: Audit professionals’ skepticism is one of the behavioral and personality traits that is effective in reducing agency costs, audit quality, and enhancing public confidence. On this basis, it is very important to know the factors contributing to enhancement or degradation of professional skepticism. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between temperamen...
متن کاملSkepticism and Naturalism : Can Philosophical Skepticism be Scientifically Tested ?
It may be possible to scientifically test philosophical skepticism; at least this is what I shall maintain. The argument develops the naturalistic insight that there may be no particular reason to suppose that nature has selected Homo sapiens’ epistemic capacities such that we are ideally suited to forming a true theory of everything, or indeed, a true theory of much of anything. Just as chimpa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Michigan Law Review
سال: 1986
ISSN: 0026-2234
DOI: 10.2307/1288945